Assessing the Technical Efficiency of Electricity Distribution Companies in Nigeria –The Deterministic DEA Approach

  • Johnson S. Olayemi Department of Economics, Nigerian Defence Academy, Kaduna, Nigeria
  • Mustapha Mukhtar Department of Economics, Bayero University, Kano, Nigeria
  • Ojonugwa A. Bernard Department of Economics, Airforce Institute of Technology, Kaduna, Nigeria
  • Mike Duru Department of Economics, Ahmadu Bello University, Zaria, Nigeria
  • Yakubu Alpha Department of Economics, Nigerian Defence Academy, Kaduna, Nigeria
Keywords: DisCos, Technical Efficiency, Returns to Scale, Privatization, Two-stage DEA

Abstract

Technical efficiency (TE) is key to the productivity and profitability of firms, there is, however, a dearth of empirical assessment of the TE of the Nigerian electricity distribution companies (DisCos), raising questions about their perceived dismal performance over time. From this standpoint, therefore, it is the aim of this study to assess the TE of Nigerian DisCos using the deterministic data envelopment analysis (DEA) approach and to identify the drivers, which is significant to tackling efficiency deviations. In doing this, panel data of the eleven DisCos from 2014-2021 were used. A two-stage deterministic DEA analysis was carried out; in the first stage, the benchmarking package of R software was used to obtain the TE and the pure technical efficiency (PTE). In the second stage, the censored and truncated regression methods were used to estimate the impact of the environmental variables on TE and PTE scores.  The result showed that out of 78 decision-making units (DMUs), 21 (27%) were efficient under the constant returns to scale (CRS) assumption while 34 (44%) under variable returns to scale (VRS) were also efficient. The second stage result also showed that DisCos in the north have about a 9.1% likelihood of being more inefficient than those in the south while customer metering has a negative impact on TE. Besides, subsidy and customer density did not have any significant impact on TE. The study, therefore, makes the following recommendations: a merger among DisCos that have smaller size since the industry exhibited scale inefficiency most of the time to enjoy economies of scale; that government focuses on reducing the socio-economic problems of Nigerians especially poverty and insecurity to boost the people’s economic power thereby enabling them to settle their bills. It is also, recommended that government suspends the payment of subsidies on electricity to allow such funds to be used for the provision of infrastructure.

References

Adebulu, T. (2015, October 15). The Bureau of Public Enterprises (BPE) says it will embark on a final performance review of the electricity distribution companies (DisCos) by 2019. TheCable. https://www.thecable.ng/fg-to-review-performance-of-discos-in-2019

ANED (2021). Analysis of the commercial KPIs for ANED´s members Q2/2021. http://www.anedng.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/2021Q2.pdf

Badunenko, O. & Tauchmann, H. (2019). Simar and Wilson's two-stage efficiency analysis for Stata. The Stata Journal, 19, (4), 950–988.

Banker, R.D., Charnes, A., & Cooper, W.W., (1984). Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis. Management Science 30, 1078-1092.

Bergqvist, M. (2018). Efficiency in Swedish power grids: A two-stage double bootstrap DEA approach for estimating the effects from environmental variables. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Efficiency-in-Swedish-Power-Grids-%3A-A-Two-Stage-DEA-Bergqvist/dee3216deb5bb178a86203569109c83d967c26aa

Çelen, A. & Yalçın, N. (2012). Performance assessment of Turkish electricity distribution utilities: An application of combined FAHP/TOPSIS/DEA methodology to incorporate quality of service. Utilities Policy, 23(2012), 59-71.

Çelen, A. (2013). Efficiency and productivity (TFP) of the Turkish electricity distribution companies: An application of two-stage (DEA & Tobit) analysis. Energy Policy, 63, 300–310.

Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN) Annual Statistical Bulletins for various years: https://www.cbn.gov.ng/documents/statbulletin.asp

Chang, H., Chang, W., Das, S & Li, S. (2004). Health care regulation and the operating efficiency of hospitals: Evidence from Taiwan. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 23, 483–510.

Charnes, A., Cooper, W.W., & Rhodes, E. (1978). Measuring the efficiency of decision-making units. European Journal of Operational Research 3, 429-444.

Chen, T-Y. (2002). An assessment of technical efficiency and cross-efficiency in Taiwan's electricity distribution sector. European Journal of Operational Research 137, 421–433.

Dyson, R. G., Allen, R., Camanho, A. S., Podinovski, V. V., Sarrico, C. S., & Shale, E. A. (2001). Pitfalls and protocols in DEA. European Journal of Operational Research, 132, 245-259.

Farrell, M. J. (1957). The measurement of productive efficiency. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A (General), 120, (3), 253–290. https://doi.org/10.2307/2343100

Goncharuk, A. G., Horobets, T., Yatsyshyn, V., & Lahutina, I. (2020). Do high tariffs provide high efficiency: a case of Ukrainian electricity distribution companies. Energy Policy Journal, 23(3), 125-124.

Gujarati, D. N. & Porter, D. C. (2009). Basic Econometrics (Intn’l ed). McGraw-Hill

Gupta, S. (n.d.). https://www.quora.com/How-is-the-base-year-decided-in-calculating-inflation

Idowu, S. S., Ibietan, J., & Olukotun, A. (2019). Privatization of power sector in Nigeria: an evaluation of Ibadan and Ikeja electricity distribution companies’ performance (2005–2018). International Journal of Public Administration. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2019.1672183

Lee, B. L., Wilson C., Simshauser, P., & Majiwa, E. (2021). Deregulation, efficiency and policy determination: an analysis of Australia’s electricity distribution sector. Energy Economics, 98, (2021), 1-11. https://sci-hub.ren/10.1016/j.eneco.2021.105210

Leme, R. C., Paiva, A. P., Santos, P. E. S., Balestrassi, P. P., & Galvão, L. L. (2014). Design of experiments applied to environmental variables analysis in electricity utility efficiency: The Brazilian case. Energy Economics 45, 111–119. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2014.06.017

Lin, B. & Zhang, G. (2017). The energy efficiency of the Chinese service sector and its regional differences. Journal of Cleaner Production.
doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.09.020

NERC, (2020, December 2). Amended Orders on the Capping of Estimated Bills. https://www.nerc.gov.ng/index.php/component/remository/NERC-Orders/Amended-Orders-on-the-Capping-of-Estimated-Bills/?Itemid=591

NERC, (2021). NESI key operational & financial data for 2019 – 2020. https://www.nerc.gov.ng/index.php/component/remository/func-startdown/864/?Itemid=591

O'Donnell, C., Rao, D., & Battese, G., (2008). Meta-frontier frameworks for the study of firm-level efficiencies and technology ratios. Empirical. Economics. 34 (2), 231

Ohene-Asare, K. (2020a, youtube). Efficiency & Productivity, Data Envelopment Analysis: Step 3 - Efficiency Types, DEA. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AF0L5e9gG2o&list=PLDoDpzf4kevDs7juiNdejGDTN8HZN90Sy&index=2

Ohene-Asare, K. (2020b, youtube). Second stage DEA regression motivation, correlation, isotonicity. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iU9WM4_plX0&t=5s

Ohene-Asare, K., Turkson, C., & Afful, A. (2017). Multinational operation, ownership and efficiency differences in the international oil industry. Energy Economics, S0140988317303444–. doi:10.1016/j.eneco.2017.10.006

Onyishi, D. U. & Ofualagba, G. (2021). Analysis of the Electricity Distribution Supply in Eastern Nigeria: Current Challenges and Possible Solutions. Journal of Electrical Engineering, Electronics, Control and Computer Science –7(25), 1-8.

Pérez-Reyes, R., & Tovar, B. (2021). Peruvian electrical distribution firms’ efficiency revisited: A two-stage data envelopment analysis. Sustainability, 13, (18), 10066; https://doi.org/10.3390/su131810066

Samuel, I. (2021). The Regulatory Environment and Electricity Distribution Companies Performance in Nigeria. The International Journal of Sustainability Policy and Practice 17(1), 19-32. doi:10.18848/2325-1166/CGP/v17i01/19-32.

Sa´nchez-Ortiz, J., Garcı´a-Valderrama, T., Rodrı´guez-Cornejo, V., & Giner-Manso, Y. (2018). The effects of environmental regulation on the efficiency of distribution electricity companies in Spain, Energy & Environment, 31, (1), 3–20. https:// doi.org/full/10.1177/0958305X17745791

Simar, L., & Wilson, P. (2002). Non-parametric tests of returns to scale. European Journal of Operational Research, 139, 115-132.

Simar, L., & Wilson, P.W., (2011). Two-stage DEA: caveat emptor. J. Prod. Anal. 36, 205–218

Sudhir, M. B., & Makoto, T. (2018). Efficiency evaluation of electricity distribution utilities in India: A two-stage DEA with bootstrap estimation. Journal of Operational Research Society. https://doi.org/10.1080/01605682.2017.1398202

Vaninsky, A. (2006). Efficiency of electric power generation in the United States: Analysis and forecast based on data envelopment analysis. Energy Economics, 28(), 326–338.

Xie, B.-C., Gao, J., Chen, Y.-F. & Deng, N.-Q. (2017). Measuring the efficiency of grid companies in China: A bootstrapping non-parametric meta-frontier approach. Journal of Cleaner Production. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.11.016.

Zhao, H., Zhao, H., & Guo, S. (2018). Operational efficiency of Chinese provincial electricity grid enterprises: An evaluation employing a three-stage data envelopment analysis (DEA) Model. Sustainability, 10, (9), 3168.
Published
2024-03-06